Paste your site's URL and we'll crawl a handful of pages, checking for the technical SEO issues that matter most. Free, no signup required.
Run a focused website SEO audit that flags accessible technical and on-page issues such as missing canonicals, heading problems, and thin content signals. You receive a prioritized diagnostic list to investigate, not an automated verdict on business quality.
From Site Audit. The free check’s exact coverage is explained below.
A short path from one focused input to a next step grounded in the result.
Enter a public website or page URL you are authorized to inspect.
Let the audit fetch and analyze the supported page and site signals.
Review errors first, then warnings and contextual notices.
Confirm each finding in the page or platform before implementing a fix.
A technical SEO audit checks whether search systems can access, interpret, and consolidate a page as intended. It also reviews foundational on-page signals. Passing every check does not make content useful; it removes preventable technical ambiguity.
Find obvious technical and on-page problems before paying for a full crawl or assigning engineering work.
Use a fast diagnostic to confirm a suspected issue, then inspect the source and affected URL set.
Share concrete page-level findings with the team that can fix the template, content, or deployment behavior.
Critical access, indexing, or canonical conflicts deserve prompt confirmation and remediation.
Warnings often need context; a short page or absent tag can be intentional in some templates.
A clean scan is not proof of rankings, quality, or full-site health because the free audit has bounded coverage.
Confirm it with source code and search-console evidence, then fix and retest the exact URL.
Trace it to the template or CMS so one controlled change can solve the pattern.
Move to intent, content, internal-link, authority, and performance analysis instead of inventing technical work.
The free check is useful for rapid page-level orientation. A full site audit crawls many URLs, identifies patterns, schedules recrawls, tracks fixes, and connects issues to templates and ownership.
A useful first pass asks whether the page can be fetched, indexed, and understood. That includes the response, canonical choice, robots signals, title, description, main heading, links, and available structured data. Content observations add context, but they do not replace a subject-matter review or analytics evidence.
The free check is intentionally narrower than a full site audit. It cannot prove that every URL shares the same issue, map all redirect chains, measure every template, or reconstruct historical impact. Use it to create a focused hypothesis and then widen the investigation only where the evidence supports it.
Start with blockers: failed responses, accidental noindex directives, crawler restrictions, broken canonicals, or missing primary content. Next address issues that affect important templates or high-value pages. Cosmetic metadata improvements on a low-value URL should not outrank an indexability problem across a revenue-driving section.
Confirm every finding in the rendered page and source before changing production. Some signals are intentional, environment-specific, or owned by a shared template. Record the affected URL, expected behavior, observed behavior, evidence, and owner so the recommendation can be tested rather than interpreted as generic advice.
Re-run after the deployed fix is available and verify the exact signal that failed. A changed score is less useful than confirming that the intended canonical, heading, response, link, or robots directive now appears. Also test a representative page from every affected template rather than assuming one corrected URL proves the whole site is fixed.
Recurring crawls are appropriate for larger sites, frequent releases, multiple editors, and regressions that are difficult to spot manually. SearchChamp’s paid Site Audit adds broader coverage, prioritization, history, and workflow; the free checker remains useful for first diagnosis and post-fix confirmation.
The audit fetches publicly accessible content and evaluates the technical and on-page checks supported by the free workflow at run time.
It cannot see private analytics, search-console data, every rendered state, all URLs, or business intent. Some findings require human confirmation.
The free website SEO checker is described against the checks it actually surfaces from the submitted site or page, including status, title and description, canonical, headings, robots and indexability signals, links, structured data, and content observations where available. It is not presented as a complete crawl of every URL or a guarantee of search performance.
Product behavior reviewed September 2026No. It reads available pages and reports findings; it does not publish fixes.
No. Technical health supports discoverability but does not guarantee relevance, authority, or rankings.
Templates and page purposes differ, so some heuristics need contextual review.
Start with a representative important page; use a full crawl when you need sitewide coverage.
The free Website SEO Audit is designed for a focused, one-off answer. Use Site Audit when you need saved work, broader coverage, recurring analysis, and a workflow your team can revisit.